To make a div take up one-third of the screen width on large-size devices, and half the width in medium-size devices.
#Best module for simple grids js code#
In the lower versions of Bootstrap, the grid was defined as a total of 12 columns, which resulted in code such as
The above syntax is how you’d code in Bootstrap 4, which owes a lot of its elegance to the raw power of Flexbox and other modern layout features supported by browsers directly. The current popular version of Bootstrap is 4, which was a major overhaul over the 3.3 series. For example, if you have three “boxes” you want to position side by side on large screens, but vertically on smaller screens, this is what you’d do: A grid is an invisible partition of the screen into columns (along with the width). 3.0)īootstrap achieved responsive design by introducing the idea of a grid. It was the first framework to promote the philosophy of “mobile-first.” No longer was designing for smaller screen sizes a separate project in itself all you needed to do was include the relevant Bootstrap classes, and the design would automatically adjust for different screen sizes (well, almost). So if you’re tired of hand-coding CSS rules, dive in for some quick relief! BootstrapĪn initiative by Twitter, Bootstrap takes credit for introducing responsive design on a large scale. This post casts a sweeping glance at the front-end development landscape and compares the front-runners among CSS frameworks. Today we can’t imagine coding without our favorite CSS framework, as targeting multiple screen sizes has become a necessity.īut how do you know your framework is the best for the job at hand? Also, if you’re new to front-end development, which framework should help you pick? No wonder, then, that CSS frameworks emerged over time and took most of the pain away.
#Best module for simple grids js full#
It’s a standard that evolved haphazardly, was interpreted differently by different browser manufacturers, and is now so full of contradictions that nobody dares call themselves a “CSS expert”. And even if you manage to pull it off, there’s always the lurking fear that it might just break horribly on some stupid browser somewhere! CSS ties for the first spot of “necessary web evils” along with JavaScript.
Doing something that sounds as easy and common-sense-driven as centering a box within a box is incredibly difficult to work out in CSS. I once heard a front-end developer joke, “The NASA has landed robots on Mars, and here we’re still struggling to center-align our divs!” And it makes me feel bad that this joke has a lot of truth in it.
0 kommentar(er)
